Report raises real level of concern on environmental causes of cancer
The University of Massachusetts, Lowell has released a very important report (September 2005) that links dozens of environmental and occupational exposures to nearly 30 types of cancer. It makes a mockery of claims by leading UK cancer charities and health bodies that environmental causes of cancer are small.
Ignore the report at your peril.
"The sum of the evidence makes an airtight case for reconsideration of chemicals policies in the U.S.," said Dr. Richard W. Clapp, lead epidemiologist for the report and adjunct professor at UMass Lowell. "We need to follow the example of the European Unions REACH program, which prevents the use of known or suspected carcinogens when suitable substitutes are readily available."
N.B. As an update to our readers, the REACH project has in fact delayed action from a Euro MP vote concluding that over a thousand common chemicals should be replaced immediately in everyday products. Each chemical is now to be researched, which could take 15 years!! However J&J has been pressured by consumer groups to remove a number of chemicals of concern from its products; and IARC/the World Health Organisation have labelled EMFs and Glyphosphate (the chemical in Monsantos RoundUp) as probably carcinogenic.
The review makes it clear that new knowledge about multiple causes of cancer renders making such estimates not just pointless, but counterproductive
The errors of the past?
The report also suggests that past findings may be mistaken, for example the often-cited analysis by the late Sir Richard Doll and Richard Peto that attributes only 2 to 4 percent of cancers to involuntary environmental and occupational exposures. "Our review makes it clear that new knowledge about multiple causes of cancer, including involuntary exposures, early-life exposures, synergistic effects, and genetic factors, renders making such estimates not just pointless, but counterproductive," Clapp said.
The extensive study by the Universitys Lowell Center for Sustainable Production reviewed scientific evidence documenting associations between environmental and occupational exposures and certain cancers in the United States - marking the first time this massive body of material has been summarized in one, accessible document. (Contact: Patti McCafferty, 978-934-3238, [email protected].)
"We need to pay attention to environmental and occupational risk factors," said Molly Jacobs, project manager. "Known and preventable exposures are clearly responsible for tens of thousands of excess cancer cases each year. It is unconscionable not to implement policy changes that we know will prevent sickness and death."
"Environmental and Occupational Causes of Cancer: A Review of Recent Scientific Evidence" shows that many cancer cases and deaths are caused or contributed to by involuntary exposures. These include: bladder cancer from the primary solvent used in dry cleaning, breast cancer from endocrine disruptors like bisphenol-A and other plastics components, lung cancer from residential exposure to radon, non-Hodgkins lymphoma from solvent and herbicide exposure, and childhood leukemia from pesticides.
The sum of the evidence makes an airtight case for reconsideration of chemicals policies in the U.S. Despite notable gains in reducing incidence and mortality rates for certain cancers, the authors lament that cancer constitutes a growing burden on society. They note that the mortality rate for all cancers combined (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) is the same today as it was in the 1940s and the annual rate of new cases increased by 85 percent over the past 50 years.
"Major cancer agencies have largely avoided the urgency of acting on what we know to prevent people from getting cancer in the first place," said researcher Genevieve Howe.
The report disputes the 25 year-old analysis that attributes only 2 to 4 % of cancers to involuntary environmental and occupational exposures The report disputes the often-cited, 25 year-old analysis by Sir Richard Doll and Richard Peto that attributes only 2 to 4 percent of cancers to involuntary environmental and occupational exposures. "Our review makes it clear that new knowledge about multiple causes of cancer, including involuntary exposures, early-life exposures, synergistic effects, and genetic factors, renders making such estimates not just pointless, but counterproductive," Clapp said.
The nearly 50-page report was produced as part of the Lowell Center for Sustainable Productions Environmental Health Initiative and sponsored by the Collaborative on Health and the Environment. It is available at www.sustainableproduction.org and www.cheforhealth.org.
TO READ MORE ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL CAUSES AND SPECIC CANCERS CLICK HERE
The Lowell Center for Sustainable Production at UMass Lowell uses rigorous science, collaborative research, and innovative strategies to promote communities, workplaces and products that are healthy, humane and respectful of natural systems.
UMass Lowell, a comprehensive university with special expertise in applied science and technology, is committed to educating students for lifelong success and conducting research and outreach activities that sustain the economic, environmental and social health of the region. UML offers its 11,000 undergraduate and graduate students more than 80 degree programs in the colleges of Arts and Sciences, Engineering and Management, and the School of Health and Environment and the Graduate School of Education. Visit the website at www.uml.edu.